US Torture Policy Explained January 1, 2015Posted by grellet in Uncategorized.
Tags: Senate Torture Report, Richard Cheney
add a comment
Thought we’d start the new year out right by sharing my enhanced understanding of our country’s EITs (or enhanced interrogation techniques). Thanks to Vice President Cheney’s Meet the Press interview of 14 December, I am much clearer regarding our country’s torture policy. In addition, I thoroughly comprehend now why a majority of our fellow countrymen/women are totally down with it.
Here’s our policy, simply stated:
1. Our country does not torture. Our country will sometimes use techniques that stop short of our definition of torture: the physical pain “equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death.” In other words, we only “torture” (quotation marks required), but we never torture.*
2. We “torture” to save our asses.**
3. If “torture” cannot save our asses, it’s at least worth a try.***
4. If we sometimes torture innocent people, well, it’s an honest mistake. Besides, those guys have brown skin and Arab names, so they don’t count.****
5. We can “torture” because we’re the good guys.***** No one else is permitted to torture or even to “torture.”
* “We were very careful to stop short of torture…. All of the techniques that were authorized by the president were, in effect, blessed by the Justice Department opinion that we could go forward with those without, in fact, committing torture.” Transcript of Meet the Press Interview
**”Our objective is to get the guys who did 9/11 and it is to avoid another attack against the United States.”
*** (excerpt of Senate Torture Report) “A review of C.I.A. cables and other C.I.A. records found that the use of the C.I.A.’s enhanced interrogation technique played no role in the identification of Jose Padilla or the thwarting of the dirty bomb or the tall buildings plot.”
****Chuck Todd: “25% of the detainees though, 25% turned out to be innocent. They were released…Is that too high? You’re okay with that margin for error?” Mr. Cheney: “I have no problem as long as we achieve our objective.”
*****”Chuck, if you look at it and you look at what the people running the agency said and what Jose Rodriguez said who ran the program, he’s a good man.”
Hope this clears things up for our readers.
It’s official: waterboarding is torture September 7, 2014Posted by grellet in Uncategorized.
add a comment
ISIS waterboarded its hostages before killing them. So now waterboarding is torture.
Senate Hearing on Closing Guantanamo July 27, 2013Posted by grellet in Guantánamo Bay Prison, torture.
add a comment
Last Wednesday, July 24, I Joined friends from Witness Against Torture, World Can’t Wait, Code Pink, National Religious Campaign Against Torture, and Amnesty International in holding a vigil outside the Dirksen Senate building and then attending the “Hearing on Closing Guantanamo: The National Security, Fiscal, and Human Rights Implications,” convened by Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL). The following persons gave testimony:
Army General Paul Eaton (ret)
Brigadier General Stephen Xenakis (ret)
Frank Gaffney, Founder and president of the Center for Security Policy
Navy Lt. Joshua Fryday
Elisa Massimino, President and CEO, Human Rights First
and two invited members of the House of Representatives, Adam Smith (D-WA) and Mike Pompeo (R-KS)
Senators Durbin, Dianne Feinstein, Patrick Leahy, and Ted Cruz also gave extended remarks
The video is now available for your viewing pleasure on the C-SPAN website:
Some highlights of the testimony given:
In his opening statement, Sen. Durbin reminded those attending of former Sec. of Defense Rumsfeld’s approval of the use of torture, and he quoted Justice Sandra Day O’Connor: “a state of war is not a blank check for the president.” The main thrust of his argument was that detainees can be safely held at supermax facilities in the U.S., from which no one has ever escaped. In fact, according to the senator, nearly 500 terrorists have been tried in the U.S. and are currently being held under supermax conditions. Unfortunately, in emphasizing the airtight security of our supermax prisons, Mr. Durbin left the impression that all the Gitmo detainees are actually guilty of some crime. To the contrary, 86 of them were been cleared for release long ago by the Combat Status Review Tribunals. As a matter of fact, I do not remember any mention at any time during the hearing that the vast majority of detainees ended up in custody. after being betrayed far from the battlefield for a hefty ransom offered by our government.
Finally, I must confess to being less than delighted with the senator’s reassurances that any detainee who dares to resume hostilities against the U.S. (uh, how can one “resume” an action that one never practiced in the first place?) will surely perish in a US drone strike. A truly comforting thought on many levels…
Gen. Eaton reminded the committee of the “Gitmoization” of Abu Ghraib and stated that there is “no national security reason to keep Guantánamo open.”
The most riveting statements were made by Brig. Gen. Xenakis, a practicing psychiatrist who has examined at least 50 of the detainees over the years. He unequivocally condemned force-feeding the hunger strikers, deploring the fact that military medical personnel are placed in an “untenable position,” as force-feeding is in blatant violation of their professional medical ethics and international human rights standards. He called for “independent doctors and nurses” to be brought in to care for the detainees.
Frank Gaffney made the breathtaking generalization that Guantánamo can never be closed because the detainees are all dedicated to the “doctrine of Sharia” and “believe it’s their duty to destroy us.” He also cautioned that detainees, if transferred to supermax facilities on the mainland, will proselytize in the US prisons.” Mr. Gaffney has obviously never read any of the Combatant Status Review Tribunal transcripts and seems to have a spotty understanding of Islam, to say the least.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein seemed to have the clearest appreciation of why some detainees are on hunger strike. She explained that a hunger strike is a form of protest, not attempted suicide, and reinforced the stance that force-feeding violates “international norms and medical ethics.” She also reminded those present that locking prisoners away indefinitely without trial is “not the American way” and “makes a myth out of our legal system.” Not to mention the revelation that it costs $2.7 million per year to keep each detainee at Guantánamo. One can only hope that fiscal concerns will convince those not moved by ethical considerations.
Finally, I can only conclude that Rep. Mike Pompeo and Sen. Feinstein, who have both toured Guantánamo, must have visited two different places. Sen. Feinstein saw that “everything down there is so deceiving,” including the shiny new courtroom with no trials scheduled, and came away convinced that Gitmo “falsifies our principles.” Congressman Pompeo, on the other hand, made the following edifying statements:
“There are no human rights violations occurring at Guantanamo Bay.”
The hunger strike currently in progress is “a political stunt orchestrated or encouraged at least in part by counsel for the detainees.”
There is “no question of the constitutionality of Guantanamo.”
In short, the arguments to close Gitmo rested on international human rights considerations and the principle of the rule of law, while those who maintained that the place is essential to our national security appealed to naked fear. As Sen Leahy put it, “We are the most powerful nation on earth. Why are we afraid to use our justice system?”
Thanks to Witness Against Torture for the photo of the suspicious, jumpsuit-clad individual.
Taking Torture Personally July 1, 2013Posted by grellet in Guantánamo Bay Prison, torture, Torture Awareness Month.
add a comment
Last Wednesday was the International Day of Support for Victims of Torture and the 140th day of the Guantanamo Bay detainee hunger strike. I headed down to Washington, D.C. to take part in the protest in front of the White House organized by the National Religious Campaign Against Torture, Amnesty International USA, Witness Against Torture, World Can’t Wait, Torture Abolition and Survivor Support Coalition, and many other human rights groups.
We displayed the names of the 86 detainees cleared for release years ago, yet still imprisoned. Many are on hunger strike, the only means they have to get the American government to notice their plight and let them go.
We condemned the force-feeding of the detainees who are on hunger strike.
In obedience to the Light Within, I follow the example of Friends who supported their imprisoned brothers and sisters in 17th-century England, who have long worked to improve prison conditions (even for those convicted of grievous crimes), who helped slaves escape to freedom, who were part of feminism’s First Wave, and who currently assist vets in obtaining the medical benefits they so desperately need.
I affirm that those whose legal and human rights are being violated have the right to protest nonviolently, even if the only way they can do so is by fasting.I denounce force-feeding as torture and deplore the pain and suffering inflicted on them.
I march, clothed as the detainees were clothed when they first arrived at Gitmo, because they cannot march. Their fast is their voice, my footsteps are mine.
However, when all all is said and done, I was just there for decoration. My friend and fellow Quaker Megan really lived her conviction and joined those who chose to risk arrest and were indeed arrested. Not sure I’ll ever have that sort of courage. She stood before the the White House fence radiating a quiet, assured, loving peacefulness. A real example of what it means to live the Peace Testimony.
Unfortunately for the cause of those subjected to torture and solitary confinement (but fortunately for gays who have also been awaiting justice), the Supreme Court chose the same day to hand down its momentous decisions. This had two consequences for our group of protesters. First, we didn’t get much press coverage. Second, I think the absence of recognizable journalists emboldened the police to use more severe tactics. For instance, I saw them force an elderly, nonviolent vet to lie face-down in the street while they handcuffed him.
Here are some other sites with photos and videos of the protest:
Video of speakers — vet face-down on ground toward the end
Medea Benjamin being thrown to the ground
Photo gallery – close-up of Diane Wilson being arrested
Story on CommonDreams
I hope we Americans find a way to throw off our pall of self-righteousness, paranoia, and vengeance and start treating everyone as children of the same Divine Parent.
Remember those who are in prison, as though you were in prison with them; those who are being tortured, as though you yourselves were being tortured. Hebrews 13:3